By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
IndebtaIndebta
  • Home
  • News
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • Investing
  • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
  • Videos
  • More
    • Finance
    • Dept Management
    • Small Business
Notification Show More
Aa
IndebtaIndebta
Aa
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Dept Management
  • Mortgage
  • Markets
  • Investing
  • Small Business
  • Videos
  • Home
  • News
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • Investing
  • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
  • Videos
  • More
    • Finance
    • Dept Management
    • Small Business
Follow US
Indebta > News > China’s court database reform stokes fears for transparency in legal sector
News

China’s court database reform stokes fears for transparency in legal sector

News Room
Last updated: 2024/01/06 at 10:35 PM
By News Room
Share
5 Min Read
SHARE

Stay informed with free updates

Simply sign up to the Chinese politics & policy myFT Digest — delivered directly to your inbox.

A new Chinese legal database is stoking fears among legal experts about declining data transparency against the backdrop of a wider government clampdown on access to information under President Xi Jinping.

China’s Supreme People’s Court on Monday launched the National Court Judgements Database, a record of legal judgments that the government says will “be open to experts, scholars [and] lawyers”.

But the country’s top court has not clarified the extent to which the database’s case filings will be available to the public, and Caixin, a local business outlet, has reported that it will be an internal system for court personnel.

Its introduction has also raised concerns about the future of an existing archive, China Judgements Online. Since 2013, China Judgments Online has been a crucial source of information for domestic and international lawyers, analysts and businesses. But over the past years, the number of documents it has published has sharply declined, its records show.

Since the beginning of Xi’s unprecedented third term in power in late 2022, Chinese authorities have increasingly restricted public access to information, from economic indicators to regulatory decision-making, creating further challenges for foreign policymakers, analysts and businesses to assess the country’s direction as it emerges from pandemic isolation.

Authorities have passed anti-espionage and data security laws to tighten cross-border controls of sensitive trade and economic information that have left companies struggling to comply. China in June also stopped reporting youth unemployment, which had hit record levels amid a flagging economic recovery from the pandemic.

Chinese officials have in the past lauded China Judgements Online as the largest archive of its kind in the world, with more than 140mn records. But newly published court documents sank to their lowest level in a decade last year, with no more than 10mn additions.

Only 30 per cent of judgments — which span criminal, civil and administrative cases as well as government compensation and enforcement actions — were made public in 2022, compared with more than 70 per cent a few years earlier.

Reduced activity on China Judgements Online, combined with limited reassurances about the new judicial database and its function, has sparked concern among lawyers and legal analysts.

“This should be considered a major reform, a major change, but the rationale for the reform is a black box,” said one expert on Chinese law who asked to remain anonymous.

“Practising lawyers use [the existing database] for many, many reasons”, including deciding which court to litigate in and assessing the chances of success of particular legal arguments, the person added.

A leaked state media circular regarding the new database in December sparked widespread social media scrutiny. Last month, state broadcaster CCTV published a Q&A with an unnamed official that aimed to address transparency concerns but noted the Supreme People’s Court in July 2021 introduced “targeted rectification measures” for China Judgements Online, citing security concerns, that resulted in a reduction in available documents.

International businesses also heavily rely on China Judgements Online to conduct due diligence in China as part of their business operations or new investment decisions.

“I’m not sure they would leave the current information up there for free, it doesn’t seem to be consistent with what they’re doing,” said one person involved in due diligence who also declined to be named. “There seems to be a genuine pivot towards having a less open judicial system.”

The Supreme People’s Court of China did not respond to a request for comment.

Additional reporting by Cheng Leng in Hong Kong and Wenjie Ding in Beijing

Read the full article here

News Room January 6, 2024 January 6, 2024
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Finance Weekly Newsletter

Join now for the latest news, tips, and analysis about personal finance, credit cards, dept management, and many more from our experts.
Join Now
Gold prices on the move, Tesla set to report earnings after the bell

Watch full video on YouTube

How AI Is Killing The Value Of A College Degree

Watch full video on YouTube

The 200-Year-Old Secret: Why Preferred Stock Is The Ultimate Fixed Income Hybrid

This article was written byFollowRida Morwa is a former investment and commercial…

US steps up blockade of Venezuela by seeking to board third oil tanker

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for freeYour guide to what Trump’s…

Fraudsters use AI to fake artwork authenticity and ownership

Stay informed with free updatesSimply sign up to the Artificial intelligence myFT…

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

You Might Also Like

News

The 200-Year-Old Secret: Why Preferred Stock Is The Ultimate Fixed Income Hybrid

By News Room
News

US steps up blockade of Venezuela by seeking to board third oil tanker

By News Room
News

Fraudsters use AI to fake artwork authenticity and ownership

By News Room
News

JPMorgan questioned Tricolor’s accounting a year before its collapse

By News Room
News

Delaware high court reinstates Elon Musk’s $56bn Tesla pay package

By News Room
News

How Ford’s bet on an electric ‘truck of the future’ led to a $19.5bn writedown

By News Room
News

Which genius from history would have been the best investor?

By News Room
News

How Friedrich Merz’s EU summit plan on frozen Russian assets backfired

By News Room
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Youtube Instagram
Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Press Release
  • Contact
  • Advertisement
More Info
  • Newsletter
  • Market Data
  • Credit Cards
  • Videos

Sign Up For Free

Subscribe to our newsletter and don't miss out on our programs, webinars and trainings.

I have read and agree to the terms & conditions
Join Community

2023 © Indepta.com. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?