Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
US prosecutors on Monday sought to portray British tech entrepreneur Mike Lynch as “a controlling, dominating, intimidating boss” and “the driving force behind [a] massive fraud”, as the trial over events that transfixed Silicon Valley more than a decade ago got under way in San Francisco.
Lynch, the former chief executive of UK software company Autonomy, pulled off “an elaborate multi-layered, multiyear fraud” that involved overstating his company’s revenues by tens of millions of dollars and leading Hewlett-Packard to overpay in a $11.5bn acquisition, said Adam Reeves, the lead prosecutor.
The Autonomy deal, which the prosecution claims involved the biggest fraud in Silicon Valley history, was central to HP’s efforts to turn itself round and reinvent itself as a tech company with a heavy reliance on software. As its strategy foundered, it laid off more than 100,000 workers and was eventually split up.
Lynch — who has spent years masterminding his defence through a series of proceedings, including a civil fraud case and extradition hearings in the UK — sat impassively at his lawyers’ table in a dark suit and tie and a white shirt during opening arguments. He has pleaded not guilty.
The trial comes 10 months after he was extradited to the US, forcing him to live under house arrest and 24-hour surveillance in San Francisco.
Lynch is standing trial alongside Stephen Chamberlain, Autonomy’s former vice-president of finance, on 15 charges of wire fraud and conspiracy that carry potentially lengthy prison sentences. Lynch also faces a charge of securities fraud. Autonomy’s chief financial officer, Sushovan Hussain, was convicted on similar charges and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment in 2019.
In an opening statement, Reeves told jurors that the trial, which is expected to last three months, would revolve around complex accounting methods that Autonomy used to artificially inflate its revenue.
“There’s a lot of jargon around these deals,” Reeves said. “Don’t worry about that. Keep your eyes on the dollars.” The company had backdated sales, engaged in round-trip transactions with customers to compensate them for buying its software, and falsely dressed up lossmaking hardware transactions as software deals, he said.
Reeves also suggested there would be little documentary evidence directly implicating Lynch in the transactions and accounting entries at the centre of the fraud claims. Instead, he said the company’s former CFO had been central in carrying out the fraud.
The jury would be able to draw “a reasonable inference that Hussain’s centrality was exactly how Mike Lynch wanted it”, enabling him to exercise control “without creating a paper trail back to him”, he said.
Read the full article here
