By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
IndebtaIndebta
  • Home
  • News
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • Investing
  • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
  • Videos
  • More
    • Finance
    • Dept Management
    • Small Business
Notification Show More
Aa
IndebtaIndebta
Aa
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Dept Management
  • Mortgage
  • Markets
  • Investing
  • Small Business
  • Videos
  • Home
  • News
  • Banking
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • Investing
  • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
  • Videos
  • More
    • Finance
    • Dept Management
    • Small Business
Follow US
Indebta > News > Dorsey, Musk, Trump and the battle for Twitter
News

Dorsey, Musk, Trump and the battle for Twitter

News Room
Last updated: 2024/03/14 at 3:02 AM
By News Room
Share
9 Min Read
SHARE

In August 2016, Twitter secured a $5mn advertising deal with Donald Trump’s election campaign, including the promise that it could have an emoji automatically run alongside a bespoke hashtag. Most brands employ an image of their logo, but the campaign wanted to use the emoji of a robber running away with a bag of money. The hashtag? #CrookedHillary. 

Days before it was supposed to go live, Twitter balked. Trump’s team was furious, and pulled part of the deal. “For [then chief executive Jack] Dorsey and Twitter, it was an embarrassing and costly introduction to dealing with Trump,” writes Bloomberg journalist Kurt Wagner in his new book Battle for the Bird. “It was also a reminder of the power it suddenly had.” 

Dorsey’s anxiety about this power — and the question of what happens when Elon Musk wields it — lies at the heart of Wagner’s book. He draws on dozens of interviews, leaked documents, court filings and public statements to chronicle the Dorsey era, which now seems like a distant memory, as well as Musk’s dramatic first year at the helm. 

Another book, Extremely Hardcore by Zoë Schiffer, is a sharp and deeply sourced fly-on-the-wall account of similar subject matter — focusing in particular on the impact of the takeover on Twitter’s staff, thousands of whom had their lives up-ended by Musk’s job cuts and overhaul of company culture when he took control of the business in October 2022 and renamed it X.

Book cover of Battle for the Bird

“It’s a business case study, a labour investigation, and a murder mystery,” explains Schiffer, a journalist at Platformer, an online tech publication. “The body count is still being tallied”. It’s also packed with original reporting; Schiffer single-handedly broke a great deal of news on Twitter’s inner workings herself. 

Dorsey and Musk represent the extremes of leadership. Dorsey’s hands-off style led Twitter to breaking point, the authors argue, only for Musk’s hardcore approach break it some more. While much ink has been spilled on Twitter as the saga has unfolded, these titles are an important exploration of the impact of personality and politics on communication tools so powerful and ubiquitous that some argue they should be public utilities.

But first: Dorsey. After co-founding Twitter in 2006, he was chief executive until he was fired in 2008, only to return to that position again in 2015. From the outset, he loathed the perennial challenge of maintaining a “healthy” space while also enabling free speech. 

In Wagner’s telling (Dorsey himself declined to be interviewed), between 2015 and 2021 the eccentric, intermittent fasting, ice-bathing CEO fashioned a rambunctious but collaborative company culture, hosting gaudy work events (at one, the chief financial officer “wore glow sticks around his neck and bright orange suspenders”) and delegating much decision-making. 

With a mega-rich provocateur in charge, ‘the power that Dorsey so worried about has only been further centralised’

Over time, however, Dorsey — born to a Republican father and Democrat mother and “a huge proponent of transparency” — grew uncomfortable with moderation decisions made by his subordinates. These decisions included cutting down on Covid misinformation, suppressing the New York Post’s 2020 exposé on Hunter Biden’s laptop, and eventually banning Trump in the wake of the January 6 2021 riots at the US Capitol.

Instead of stepping in, Dorsey checked out, part bruised by attempts by aggressive activist investor Elliott Management to oust him, part distracted by his bitcoin endeavours. He seems to have believed that the man to rescue Twitter was Musk, for whom he has a sycophantic adoration, and was instrumental in supporting his $44bn approach. 

As has been widely reported, Dorsey’s faith in Musk turned out to be grossly misplaced. With a mega-rich provocateur in charge, and no board of directors, “the power that Dorsey so worried about has only been further centralised”, Wagner writes. 

Book cover of Extremely Hardcore

What emerges in both books is a gaping chasm between Musk’s self-declared devotion to free speech — fighting what he has repeatedly called the “woke mind virus” — and the day-to-day use of his power as leader, which often seems capricious. Neither book explores the enthusiasm of some prominent figures in the tech industry for free speech. Schiffer suggests that the hardening of Musk’s libertarian views (he has previously voted Democrat) may be personal; he believes “woke” culture affected his trans daughter, who has now disavowed him and become a Marxist.

Perhaps the greatest example of Musk’s libertarianism coming up against his own ego occurred in February 2023, when US President Joe Biden got more views than the billionaire on a tweet about the American football Super Bowl. According to Schiffer, the Twitter CEO’s response was to order an “all hands on deck effort” from engineers to determine why, and artificially boost his own tweets.

In the past 15 months, as the platform has become increasingly rowdy, advertisers have pulled away, edging the company close to bankruptcy. Just like Dorsey before him, “Musk seems to be learning the hard way that having power and control over global speech is a much greater burden than most people realise,” Wagner writes. 

Notably absent from both accounts are insights from those left holding the bag. What of the Wall Street bankers — Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays — who loaned Musk $13bn for the purchase? Or the equity investors, such as Larry Ellison, billionaire founder of Oracle, who put in $1bn? Do they care about his chaotic business decisions thus far? Or do they have faith in his ability to turn things around in the longer term?

There are rare flashes of success. In 2023, Twitter embarked on a savage cost-cutting exercise directed by Musk’s inner circle, saving $1bn — double their $500mn goal, according to Schiffer. But always there seem to be unintended consequences: it remains unclear if Twitter will face lawsuits for refusing to pay bills or regulatory action, as the Federal Trade Commission hovers.

Presumably because of their publishing schedules, both books stop in 2023, but this story by no means finished. So far, Musk appears to be a man without a plan. As we head into a year of dozens of elections globally, and increased fears about the spread of misinformation, it seems likely that Musk will keep us guessing.

Extremely Hardcore: Inside Elon Musk’s Twitter by Zoë Schiffer Portfolio $30, 352 pages

Battle for the Bird: Jack Dorsey, Elon Musk, and the $44 Billion Fight for Twitter’s Soul by Kurt Wagner Hodder & Stoughton £25/Atria Books $30, 368 pages

Hannah Murphy is an FT tech correspondent based in San Francisco

Join our online book group on Facebook at FT Books Café and subscribe to our podcast Life & Art wherever you listen

Read the full article here

News Room March 14, 2024 March 14, 2024
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Finance Weekly Newsletter

Join now for the latest news, tips, and analysis about personal finance, credit cards, dept management, and many more from our experts.
Join Now
Pressure grows on Target as activist investor builds stake

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects…

Mosque bombing in Alawite district in Syria leaves at least 8 dead

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects…

EU will lose ‘race to the bottom’ on regulation, says competition chief

Stay informed with free updatesSimply sign up to the EU business regulation…

“It’s a very bad bet to bet against US companies”: Analyst

Watch full video on YouTube

We Went To Intel’s Arizona Chip Fab To See If It Can Regain Its Edge

Watch full video on YouTube

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

You Might Also Like

News

Pressure grows on Target as activist investor builds stake

By News Room
News

Mosque bombing in Alawite district in Syria leaves at least 8 dead

By News Room
News

EU will lose ‘race to the bottom’ on regulation, says competition chief

By News Room
News

Columbia Short Term Bond Fund Q3 2025 Commentary (Mutual Fund:NSTRX)

By News Room
News

Franklin Mutual International Value Fund Q3 2025 Commentary (MEURX)

By News Room
News

US bars former EU commissioner Thierry Breton and others over tech rules

By News Room
News

BJ’s Wholesale Club: Gaining More Confidence In Its Ability To Grow EPS

By News Room
News

The 200-Year-Old Secret: Why Preferred Stock Is The Ultimate Fixed Income Hybrid

By News Room
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Youtube Instagram
Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Press Release
  • Contact
  • Advertisement
More Info
  • Newsletter
  • Market Data
  • Credit Cards
  • Videos

Sign Up For Free

Subscribe to our newsletter and don't miss out on our programs, webinars and trainings.

I have read and agree to the terms & conditions
Join Community

2023 © Indepta.com. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?