Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
Oil prices were muted as markets reopened following Iran’s military strike on Israel, as traders shrugged off fears the conflict could escalate into a full-blown war and curb supplies from the region.
Brent crude, the international benchmark, was flat at $90.45 a barrel as trading began in Asia on Monday morning. West Texas Intermediate, the US marker, was also broadly unchanged at $85.72/b.
The subdued reaction suggested markets were betting that the fallout from the strike would be contained after Iran said it considered the matter “concluded” and Washington sought to de-escalate tensions.
Traders had been anxiously watching to see how the market would react after the Islamic republic launched its first ever strike on Israel from its own territory on Saturday. Tehran sent drones and missiles into the Jewish state in retaliation for a suspected Israeli attack on its consulate in Damascus which killed several military commanders.
Daniel Hynes, senior commodity strategist at ANZ Bank, said the calibrated nature of the attacks and the fact that they were well telegraphed had eased market concerns.
“We had a build up in the oil price before the weekend and so a geopolitical price premium was already built in prior to this event,” he said.
US President Joe Biden has urged Israel to take a measured approach in its response. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s war cabinet met on Sunday but a decision has not yet been taken on how the country reacts.
In a statement on Saturday, Iran’s permanent mission to the UN said: “The matter can be deemed concluded. However, should the Israeli regime make another mistake, Iran’s response will be considerably more severe.”
Experts warned that a severe response from Israel could ratchet up the conflict, restricting oil supplies from the region and pushing up prices.
“A significant Israeli retaliation could trigger a destabilising retaliatory cycle and move this conflict up the escalation ladder,” said Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets and a former CIA analyst.
“In such a scenario, we think the risk to oil is not insignificant.”
She added: “While Iran lacks the capability to close the Strait of Hormuz, they seemingly retain the capacity to replicate the 2019 playbook of attacking tankers, pipelines and critical energy infrastructure.”
Oil markets had climbed to their highest level since October in recent weeks following the attack on Damascus as markets weighed the potential for an escalation of the conflict that could affect Gulf supplies.
Bob McNally, president of consultancy Rapidan Energy and a former energy adviser to George W Bush, said the fallout from the strike could still propel prices “towards, if not beyond, $100 per barrel”.
“The market had been complacent about the Gaza conflict expanding to include Iran and, therefore, a material risk to Arabian Gulf oil and [liquefied natural gas] production and exports,” he said.
An exacerbation of the conflict risks shocking an already tight oil market globally as demand escalates in big economies like the US and China while Opec+ producers constrain supply.
“The US and China stand to lose from the conflict’s expansion as it would significantly impact on energy exports from the region, the price of oil, and the global economy,” said Ayham Kamel, practice head for the Middle East and north Africa region at consultancy Eurasia group.
Any spike in prices would come at a particularly delicate moment for the US president, who has struggled to sell his economic record to voters ahead of November’s election amid stubbornly high inflation.
A further rise in crude prices threaten to exacerbate already-elevated prices at the pump months before Americans head to the polls. Average US petrol prices sit at $3.63 a gallon, according to the AAA motoring group, up about 15 per cent since the start of the year.
“It’s hard to overstate how unwelcome a geopolitically driven oil price spike would be for both the economy and President Biden’s re-election,” said McNally.
Read the full article here
